Not so long ago, those of us whose job it is to talk about luxury watches would give an inordinate amount of consideration to three principal areas: the movement that made the watch tick, the case in which it sat and the heritage from which it sprang. It seems strange to look back now and realise what a minor part of the story was taken up by the main thing you see when you look at a watch: its dial. That’s partly because a lot of the time there really wasn’t that much to talk about. Colour was rare, embellishment was painfully considered and rules – about how a watch should look, what traditions and genres it cleaved to, how it was expected to be worn – were heavily presumed and dutifully followed. Which is not to say there weren’t arrestingly beautiful designs, but in terms of what gave a watch its character, its talking points, its currency as a piece of fine watchmaking and even its sense of creative expression, the dial was often surprisingly low down the list.
from Mr Porter - The Journal https://ift.tt/iErG9H6
via IFTTT
from Mr Porter - The Journal https://ift.tt/iErG9H6
via IFTTT